My summary from #dreiCday

dreiCday

You might have missed my Monday „compass“ yesterday. Jetlag killed me on Sunday night, so this week I publish on Tuesday. I hope it was worth the wait. You’ll get a summary of the „CREATIVE COLLABORATION CULTURE DAY“ at Karlshochschule Karlsruhe, a non-profit conference organized by Christoph Thomas. The conference was a mix of presentations and open space.

Digital Workplace unboxed

Michael Koehr from Comunardo started the day with a presentation about the digital workplace. He started with the quote „Everything that can be digitized, will be digitized“ and gave a few examples for digital transformation (e.g. Uber). He then defined five levels of digital workplace maturity:

  • Level 1 – Discrete applications like Email, Office (Word, Excel), CRM (e.g. Salesforce) and ERP (=SAP).
  • Level 2 „Social: – Add things like an intranet, Sharepoints and unified communication (Skype or Jabber)
  • Level 3 „Apps are getting connected“ – E.g. single-sign-on across Apps, Outlook shows status of your Jabber contacts
  • Level 4 „Extending the reach“ – This is about scaling beyond PC and smartphone (e.g. Google glass, in the car, Alexa)
  • Level 5 „Workplace is getting smart“ – Humans interact with machines, you have digital assistants, …

Since we don’t have a standard CRM at my company my immediate reaction was that we are below level 1. But we do track customers and in some small niches we are at level 2 or 3. Michael concluded his talk on how to change towards a digital workplace. He showed four pillars of change: Ability to change – Knowhow and Skills, Willingness to change – Must and Want change.

The presentation sparked a few actionable ideas that can easily be tried out in my company. Some are rather straightforward. Others need some investment of time and budget:

  • Thank you widget in Confluence
  • Sharepoint connector for Confluence
  • Improve search across multiple systems

Inspired by Michael’s input on change I ran a session called „digital cavemen – how to lead us out of the cave“. It was an exchange of ideas and practices how to change towards a digital workplace. I got some interesting learnings out of that (e.g. Senningers model of learning zones). Here’s part of the session documentation:

digital cavemen - learning zones

digital cavemen – learning zones

We all agreed that we need to focus on people, their fears and demonstrate the benefits a digital workplace offers. Too often we are focused on the tools only.

Self-organized recruiting

The second presenter was Dr. Andreas Zeuch. He shared two stories from his own recruiting and onboarding experiences. Based on this he walked us through tons of ideas how to improve recruiting and onboarding based on self-organization. Andreas showed five categories of fit and claimed that in many organizations we only focus on #1, when we recruit:

  1. Job
  2. Team
  3. Leadership
  4. Culture of the organization
  5. Purpose of the organization

He then walked us through the whole lifecycle of an employee from identification of the need, over recruiting and onboarding to the release (e.g. termination, retirement, move to different org). He claims that if you let the team handle the whole process, you get better results (better fit, more agile, …). I fully subscribe to his arguments and can see it work. I don’t see this happening at many companies soon though. I see too many old beliefs and corporate practices that are barriers to Andreas‘ vision. But the talk was one of these little sparks that glows somewhere in my head. I’m pretty sure it will turn into a fire at some point in time. Just need to find the right starting point.

Can creativity be pre-scribed?

My favorite presentation came from Clemens Thomas, an artist and composer. Clemens started with a little exercise. He asked us to rub our hands. Friction generates heat, which he used as analogy for innovation. Besides friction he showed us nine more ingredients for creativity and innovation. Whether this is taking your time, different perspectives and acceptance of failure. In our daily business we often do the exact opposite. We ask people to deliver results fast. We want people to follow standards and norms. So no wonder that creativity gets lost and innovation is low.

One ingredient I like a lot is the de-tour. This is probably the least intuitive in our results oriented world. Artists take a rubber. Startups pivot. One German phrase came to my mind: „Der Weg ist das Ziel!“

In the following open space session I couldn’t decide between the sessions „Innovation versus Results“ and „Open Space in bigger companies“. Also I didn’t want to get more input, but rather creatively work out. So we collaboratively created this nice poster:

dreiCday sketchnotes

dreiCday sketchnotes

Generation Y and New Work

Next on stage was Jonathan Funke from Tandemploy. He stood in for his boss Anna Kaiser, who was supposed to give a talk about job sharing the end of the 40 hour work week. Jonathan shared some insights into the Generation Y and Tandemploy. He is very happy in his job and shared the great atmosphere at Tandemploy. Building office furniture together and using a storm as opportunity for a team event are great examples for team building at low/no cost. He gave a few more examples on where he sees examples for #newwork. Still I was disappointed by this talk as I didn’t learn much about success stories of job sharing and where it might not work.

Individual responsibility – blessing or curse?

Final presenter was Gebhard Borck. While we started the day digital, his presentation was fully analog. He used just sticky notes and a whiteboard to develop his pitch together with the audience. Everybody wants individual responsibility in order to have meaningful work, have fun and be agile. But the organization wants security, results and no failure. So the individual goals can be in conflict with the organization’s goals. Individual goals can lead to a local optimum but we need to strive for the global optimum.

Individual responsibility

Individual responsibility

In the Q&A Andreas Zeuch stepped in on a question about decision making. He’s going nuts when organizations just practice grassroots democracy. People need to be trained in decision making and need to understand which methodologies to use when. This spoke out of my heart. A blog post on decision making is on my creative backlog!

Conclusion

So what was in it for me? I got some actionable ideas I can try out. I got some sparks that might turn into a fire at some point. And I met lots of interesting people beyond speakers that inspired me. Johanna is trying to establish her blog http://www.livinginkarlsruhe.com/, which is also a mix of English and German articles. Check out her blog and stay tuned for her report of #dreiCday. I also met Thomas Michl, whose links of the week I follow for some time already. I think the diverse audience was the biggest plus of this event. Attendees of different ages and nationality came from different industries, university and government. This gave a lot of different perspectives. One of the ingredients for creativity!

I hope this overview of the #dreiCday was helpful for you. Let me know if you are interested in more details or would like to exchange ideas on any topic.